The Supreme Court defines the tests for dividend distribution
In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court upheld the District Court’s ruling in a derivative lawsuit and established that the criteria for distributing dividends is limited to an analysis of the financial statements from the previous two years. The Court determined that there is no justification for extending the legal language to incorporate information about anticipated losses that are not reflected in the financial reports. Advocates David Hamo and Keshet Lebel acted on behalf of Dolphin Investments, which holds a controlling interest in IDB, in the appeal.
For more details please see:
In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court upheld the District Court’s ruling in a derivative lawsuit and established that the criteria for distributing dividends is limited to an analysis of the financial statements from the previous two years. The Court determined that there is no justification for extending the legal language to incorporate information about anticipated losses that are not reflected in the financial reports. Advocates David Hamo and Keshet Lebel acted on behalf of Dolphin Investments, which holds a controlling interest in IDB, in the appeal.
For more details please see:
23.03.2025
Our firm represented NetBet in negotiating a sponsorship agreement with the UFC
READ MORE
09.03.2025
Arkia has filed an administrative petition with the Administrative Court against the Israel Airports Authority and the Minister of Transport
READ MORE
07.03.2025
The CBS has raised the Construction Input Index, and developers are paying the price
READ MORE
30.01.2025
The Israeli cybersecurity company GuardKnox has filed an urgent request for a court order to initiate proceedings and temporary relief measures
READ MORE
30.01.2025
The International Data Privacy Day is a great opportunity to assess where we stand
READ MORE
24.01.2025
