The Supreme Court defines the tests for dividend distribution
In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court upheld the District Court’s ruling in a derivative lawsuit and established that the criteria for distributing dividends is limited to an analysis of the financial statements from the previous two years. The Court determined that there is no justification for extending the legal language to incorporate information about anticipated losses that are not reflected in the financial reports. Advocates David Hamo and Keshet Lebel acted on behalf of Dolphin Investments, which holds a controlling interest in IDB, in the appeal.
For more details please see:
In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court upheld the District Court’s ruling in a derivative lawsuit and established that the criteria for distributing dividends is limited to an analysis of the financial statements from the previous two years. The Court determined that there is no justification for extending the legal language to incorporate information about anticipated losses that are not reflected in the financial reports. Advocates David Hamo and Keshet Lebel acted on behalf of Dolphin Investments, which holds a controlling interest in IDB, in the appeal.
For more details please see:
29.01.2025
Harel and Amitim have acquired a 44% stake in Sunlight’s energy projects partnership
READ MORE
09.01.2025
The public share issuance process of the Ashtrom Group has been completed, raising approximately 600 million NIS
READ MORE
14.01.2025
The position of the Gush Katif evacuees regarding the cancellation of the establishment of a logistics center near their homes has been accepted
READ MORE
13.01.2025
The Psagot Group is acquiring 100% of the shares of R.G.A Cleaning Services and the financing activities of its subsidiary, Rogon Assets
READ MORE
13.01.2025
